ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

地板和天花板效应×量表开发中的因子分析×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20001947
提出者Classical psychometricsLouis Thurstone
类型Measurement validity assessmentExploratory factor analysis methodology
开创性文献McHorney, C. A. (2000). Ten recommendations for measuring health status. Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes, 2(1), 1-5. link ↗Thurstone, L. L. (1947). Multiple-Factor Analysis: A Development and Expansion of the Vectors of Mind (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226797557
别名Floor effect, Ceiling effect, Psychometric floor effect, Measurement floorExploratory factor analysis, EFA for scale development, Factorial structure analysis
相关45
摘要Floor and ceiling effects are psychometric phenomena in which a disproportionately large proportion of respondents achieve the lowest (floor) or highest (ceiling) possible score on a measurement scale. These effects compromise scale reliability and responsiveness, limiting the instrument's ability to distinguish among respondents and detect meaningful change over time. Systematic assessment of floor and ceiling effects is essential for evaluating the psychometric adequacy of health-related quality-of-life scales, functional status measures, and other patient-reported outcomes.Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is a statistical method for discovering the underlying dimensional structure of a set of items or variables. Pioneered by Louis Thurstone in the mid-20th century, EFA is widely used to develop and validate psychometric scales by identifying groups of items that correlate together, thereby revealing latent dimensions of the construct being measured. The method reduces item sets to a smaller number of interpretable factors.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Floor and Ceiling Effect · Factor Analysis for Scale Development. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare