ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

领域图谱科学计量分析×文献耦合分析×
领域科学计量学文献计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2000s (mature form); roots in 1960s-1970s scientometrics1963
提出者Kevin Boyack, Richard Klavans, Katy Borner (field-level science mapping); broader tradition rooted in Derek de Solla Price and Henry SmallMelvin M. Kessler
类型Quantitative bibliometric analysisMethod
开创性文献Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Borner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374. DOI ↗Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(3), 123–131. DOI ↗
别名science field mapping, research field delineation, scientometric field analysis, knowledge domain mappingdocument coupling, bibliographic similarity
相关65
摘要Field-mapping scientometric analysis uses quantitative bibliometric techniques — co-citation, bibliographic coupling, co-authorship, and keyword co-occurrence — to delineate the intellectual structure and boundaries of a scientific field. By transforming large publication datasets into similarity networks and clustering them into research fronts and knowledge bases, it produces visual maps that reveal how subfields relate, where boundaries lie, and how the field evolves over time.Bibliographic coupling is a method that identifies intellectual relationships between documents by measuring their shared references. Two papers are considered 'coupled' when they cite the same sources, indicating they address related research questions or draw from the same conceptual foundations. Introduced by Kessler in 1963, this approach enables researchers to map knowledge domains and discover thematically similar publications without relying on subject cataloging or keywords.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Field-mapping Scientometric Analysis · Bibliographic Coupling. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare