ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

场域绘制元分析×定性元综合×
领域科学计量学证据综合
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1988 (meta-ethnography); field-mapping application 2000s–2010s2007
提出者Noblit & Hare (meta-ethnography base); field-mapping frame developed in review methodology literatureSandelowski & Barroso (2007), Popularized by Thomas & Harden (2008)
类型Qualitative evidence synthesis with field-mapping scopeFramework
开创性文献Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803930599Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. DOI ↗
别名field-mapping qualitative synthesis, scoping meta-ethnography, field-mapping qualitative meta-synthesis, landscape meta-ethnographyQualitative Evidence Synthesis, Thematic Synthesis, Metasynthesis, Qualitative Systematic Review
相关62
摘要Field-mapping meta-ethnography combines the breadth of a field-mapping (scoping) review with the interpretive synthesis power of meta-ethnography. It first maps the full landscape of qualitative studies on a topic to understand what has been studied and how, then applies Noblit and Hare's seven-step meta-ethnographic synthesis to generate second-order and third-order constructs that represent the accumulated qualitative evidence across that field.Qualitative meta-synthesis is a systematic method for synthesizing findings from multiple qualitative research studies (interviews, focus groups, ethnographies) to develop integrated interpretations and theoretical insights. Formalized by Sandelowski and Barroso (2007) and popularized by Thomas and Harden (2008), qualitative meta-synthesis preserves the rich, contextual, interpretive nature of qualitative evidence while enabling broader conclusions across multiple studies. Unlike quantitative meta-analysis, which pools numbers, qualitative meta-synthesis synthesizes themes, meanings, and conceptual insights—answering questions like 'How do cancer patients experience treatment side effects?' or 'What factors shape patient engagement with preventive health programs?' across multiple studies.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Field-mapping Meta-ethnography · Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare