方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 场域绘制元分析× | 元人种学× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 科学计量学 | 科学计量学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1988 (meta-ethnography); field-mapping application 2000s–2010s | 1988 |
| 提出者≠ | Noblit & Hare (meta-ethnography base); field-mapping frame developed in review methodology literature | George W. Noblit and R. Dwight Hare |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative evidence synthesis with field-mapping scope | Qualitative evidence synthesis method |
| 开创性文献 | Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803930599 | Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803930780 |
| 别名 | field-mapping qualitative synthesis, scoping meta-ethnography, field-mapping qualitative meta-synthesis, landscape meta-ethnography | qualitative meta-synthesis, interpretive synthesis, ethnographic synthesis, meta-ethnographic review |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Field-mapping meta-ethnography combines the breadth of a field-mapping (scoping) review with the interpretive synthesis power of meta-ethnography. It first maps the full landscape of qualitative studies on a topic to understand what has been studied and how, then applies Noblit and Hare's seven-step meta-ethnographic synthesis to generate second-order and third-order constructs that represent the accumulated qualitative evidence across that field. | Meta-ethnography is a systematic method for synthesising findings across multiple qualitative studies by comparing and translating the conceptual frameworks and metaphors each study uses. Developed by Noblit and Hare in 1988, it produces a new interpretive account that goes beyond any single study, preserving the richness of qualitative data while generating broader theoretical insights. It is the most influential approach to qualitative evidence synthesis in health, social, and educational research. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|