方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于实地的典型案例抽样× | 目的性抽样× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 调查方法论 | 调查方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1980s–1990s | Formalized ~1980–1990 |
| 提出者≠ | Michael Quinn Patton; Miles & Huberman | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry |
| 类型≠ | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy | Non-probability sampling strategy |
| 开创性文献≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 |
| 别名 | field typical case sampling, in-person typical case sampling, fieldwork typical case selection, on-site typical case sampling | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Field-based typical case sampling is a purposive qualitative strategy in which the researcher selects and studies cases that represent the ordinary, average, or most common instance of a phenomenon — and conducts data collection through direct fieldwork such as in-person observation, site visits, and face-to-face interviews. The combination ensures that findings portray what the phenomenon looks like under real-world, everyday conditions rather than through self-reports or online proxies. | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|