ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于现场的理论抽样×目的性抽样×
领域调查方法论调查方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1967Formalized ~1980–1990
提出者Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. StraussMichael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry
类型Qualitative iterative sampling strategyNon-probability sampling strategy
开创性文献Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796
别名field theoretical sampling, in-situ theoretical sampling, fieldwork-driven theoretical sampling, grounded field samplingjudgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling
相关34
摘要Field-based theoretical sampling is an iterative qualitative sampling strategy in which decisions about whom to observe or interview next are made during active fieldwork, guided by emerging theoretical insights from the data already collected. Rooted in Glaser and Strauss's grounded theory, it extends theoretical sampling into naturalistic, in-situ field settings — ethnographic sites, clinical environments, organizational contexts — where data collection and analysis proceed simultaneously.Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Field-based theoretical sampling · Purposive sampling. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare