方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于现场的理论抽样× | 目的性抽样× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 调查方法论 | 调查方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1967 | Formalized ~1980–1990 |
| 提出者≠ | Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative iterative sampling strategy | Non-probability sampling strategy |
| 开创性文献≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 |
| 别名 | field theoretical sampling, in-situ theoretical sampling, fieldwork-driven theoretical sampling, grounded field sampling | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling |
| 相关≠ | 3 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Field-based theoretical sampling is an iterative qualitative sampling strategy in which decisions about whom to observe or interview next are made during active fieldwork, guided by emerging theoretical insights from the data already collected. Rooted in Glaser and Strauss's grounded theory, it extends theoretical sampling into naturalistic, in-situ field settings — ethnographic sites, clinical environments, organizational contexts — where data collection and analysis proceed simultaneously. | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|