方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于田野的施特劳斯扎根理论× | 建构主义扎根理论× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990 | 2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967) |
| 提出者≠ | Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin | Kathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967) |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative theory-building approach | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803932500 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 |
| 别名 | Straussian GT with fieldwork, fieldwork-grounded theory, Strauss-Corbin grounded theory, constructivist Straussian GT | CGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory |
| 相关≠ | 4 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Field-based Straussian grounded theory applies the systematic coding procedures of Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory tradition to data generated through sustained fieldwork — direct observation, ethnographic notes, informal conversations, and artefact collection — rather than relying solely on formal interviews. The goal is to generate a substantive theory that is firmly anchored in the natural social setting where the phenomenon occurs, capturing both interaction and context. | Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|