ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于现场的定性内容分析×现场文档分析×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1980s–2000s1970s–1980s (codified in qualitative research methodology)
提出者Philipp Mayring (qualitative content analysis); applied to field settings via ethnographic and naturalistic inquiry traditionsRooted in ethnographic fieldwork traditions; systematised in qualitative education research by Bogdan & Biklen and Hammersley & Atkinson
类型Qualitative analysis methodQualitative research strategy
开创性文献Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20. link ↗Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods (5th ed.). Pearson. ISBN: 978-0205483655
别名field QCA, naturalistic qualitative content analysis, fieldwork-grounded content analysis, field-integrated QCAFBDA, field document analysis, naturalistic document analysis, ethnographic document analysis
相关36
摘要Field-based qualitative content analysis (field QCA) combines systematic, category-driven content analysis with data collected directly in naturalistic settings. Rather than working with pre-existing texts or archived material, the researcher gathers documents, field notes, artifacts, and informal textual records during fieldwork and subjects them to rigorous qualitative content analysis. The approach preserves the contextual depth of field inquiry while applying the structured, transparent analytic logic that distinguishes qualitative content analysis from purely impressionistic reading.Field-based document analysis is a qualitative strategy in which the researcher enters a real-world setting — a school, clinic, organisation, or community — and systematically collects, authenticates, and analyses documents that are naturally produced and used there. Unlike library-based or archival document analysis, the field context is integral: the researcher observes how documents function in practice, who produces and reads them, and what organisational or cultural work they perform. The approach is widely used in ethnographic, case-study, and institutional research.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Field-based qualitative content analysis · Field-based Document Analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare