ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于现场的定性内容分析×基于场域的话语分析×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1980s–2000s1980s–1990s
提出者Philipp Mayring (qualitative content analysis); applied to field settings via ethnographic and naturalistic inquiry traditionsSynthesised from Pierre Bourdieu's field theory and discourse analysis; systematised by researchers including John Frow
类型Qualitative analysis methodQualitative analytical framework
开创性文献Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20. link ↗Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674510302
别名field QCA, naturalistic qualitative content analysis, fieldwork-grounded content analysis, field-integrated QCAfield discourse analysis, Bourdieusian discourse analysis, sociological discourse analysis, FDA
相关36
摘要Field-based qualitative content analysis (field QCA) combines systematic, category-driven content analysis with data collected directly in naturalistic settings. Rather than working with pre-existing texts or archived material, the researcher gathers documents, field notes, artifacts, and informal textual records during fieldwork and subjects them to rigorous qualitative content analysis. The approach preserves the contextual depth of field inquiry while applying the structured, transparent analytic logic that distinguishes qualitative content analysis from purely impressionistic reading.Field-based discourse analysis integrates Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concept of the field — a structured social space of positions, capital, and struggle — with the close textual methods of discourse analysis. Rather than treating language as a neutral medium, it examines how discourse is produced, circulated, and received within specific social fields (education, law, journalism, science, etc.), and how discursive choices reflect and reproduce the distribution of power and capital within those fields.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Field-based qualitative content analysis · Field-based Discourse Analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare