方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 场域现象学解释学× | 解释性现象学× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s (van Manen's field articulation); philosophical roots ~1927 | 1927 (Heidegger); systematised for human sciences by van Manen in 1990 |
| 提出者≠ | Max van Manen (field application); philosophical roots in Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer | Martin Heidegger (philosophical foundation); Max van Manen (methodological systematisation) |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research approach | Qualitative interpretive research design |
| 开创性文献 | van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404126 | van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404645 |
| 别名 | field hermeneutic phenomenology, naturalistic hermeneutic phenomenology, field-grounded phenomenology, van Manen field phenomenology | hermeneutic phenomenology, van Manen phenomenology, Heideggerian phenomenology, interpretive phenomenological inquiry |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Field-based hermeneutic phenomenology investigates the meaning of lived experience by immersing the researcher in the natural setting where participants live, work, or act. Drawing on Heidegger's ontological hermeneutics and van Manen's pedagogical application, it combines sustained fieldwork — observation, conversation, and artefact collection — with iterative interpretive text analysis to uncover how participants understand and inhabit their world. | Interpretive phenomenology is a qualitative research design that investigates the meaning people attribute to their lived experiences by combining phenomenological description with hermeneutic interpretation. Rooted in Heidegger's ontology and systematised for social and human sciences by Max van Manen, it moves beyond description to ask what an experience means within a person's broader lifeworld, cultural context, and situated understanding. The researcher's own interpretive horizon is treated as an analytical resource rather than a bias to eliminate. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|