方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于场域的话语分析× | 话语分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1980s–1990s | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| 提出者≠ | Synthesised from Pierre Bourdieu's field theory and discourse analysis; systematised by researchers including John Frow | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative analytical framework | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674510302 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | field discourse analysis, Bourdieusian discourse analysis, sociological discourse analysis, FDA | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 2 |
| 摘要≠ | Field-based discourse analysis integrates Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concept of the field — a structured social space of positions, capital, and struggle — with the close textual methods of discourse analysis. Rather than treating language as a neutral medium, it examines how discourse is produced, circulated, and received within specific social fields (education, law, journalism, science, etc.), and how discursive choices reflect and reproduce the distribution of power and capital within those fields. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|