方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于场域的批判性话语分析× | 制度民族志× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1999–2001 | 1970s–1987 (developed through the 1970s–80s; consolidated in Smith 1987, 2005) |
| 提出者≠ | Norman Fairclough and Lilie Chouliaraki (synthesis with Bourdieu's field theory) | Dorothy E. Smith |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative critical discourse framework | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674510357 | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105010 |
| 别名 | Field-theoretic CDA, Bourdieusian CDA, sociological CDA, field-oriented discourse analysis | IE, sociology for people, institutional ethnographic inquiry, Smith's institutional ethnography |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Field-based Critical Discourse Analysis (Field-based CDA) integrates Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concept of the field — structured social spaces with their own rules, capital, and positions — with the linguistic and critical tools of Critical Discourse Analysis. The approach examines how language constructs, legitimates, and contests power relations within specific institutional or social fields, situating texts in their broader sociological context rather than treating discourse in isolation. | Institutional Ethnography (IE) is a qualitative research method developed by Canadian sociologist Dorothy E. Smith that investigates how people's everyday lives are shaped and coordinated by institutional texts, rules, and relations of power. Starting from the lived experience of individuals in a particular standpoint, IE traces the social organization that governs their work and troubles — revealing how macro-level institutions operate through the micro-level activities of real people. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|