ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于现场的内容分析×扎根理论×
领域质性质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19871967
提出者David L. AltheideBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
类型Qualitative analytic approachMethod
开创性文献Altheide, D. L. (1987). Ethnographic content analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 10(1), 65–77. DOI ↗Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗
别名field content analysis, naturalistic content analysis, ethnographic content analysis, ECAGT, Grounded Theory Approach
相关63
摘要Field-based content analysis is a qualitative analytic approach that systematically examines documents, artifacts, and texts encountered or produced within a natural field setting. Originally formulated by David Altheide as ethnographic content analysis (ECA), it blends the systematic rigor of traditional content analysis with the reflexive, iterative logic of ethnographic inquiry, allowing the researcher to interact continuously with the data and revise analytic categories as new meaning emerges from the field.Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Field-based Content Analysis · Grounded Theory. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare