方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于现场的建构主义扎根理论× | 主题分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s (Charmaz 2006; fully articulated by 2014) | 2006 |
| 提出者≠ | Kathy Charmaz (constructivist variant); fieldwork orientation drawn from symbolic interactionist tradition | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research design and analytic approach | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973522 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | field-based CGT, constructivist GT with fieldwork, situated grounded theory, Charmaz-field grounded theory | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Field-based constructivist grounded theory integrates Kathy Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory with active fieldwork in natural settings. Rather than relying solely on retrospective interviews, the researcher enters the participants' world — observing, interacting, and collecting data where social processes unfold — while simultaneously coding and building theory. The result is a grounded substantive theory that is both empirically anchored in real contexts and epistemologically co-constructed between researcher and participants. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|