方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于现场的经典扎根理论× | 经典扎根理论× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1967 (Glaser & Strauss); field-based application codified from late 1970s onward | 1967 |
| 提出者≠ | Barney G. Glaser (classic GT); field-based variant draws on naturalistic inquiry traditions | Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative theory-generating design | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Sociology Press. link ↗ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| 别名 | Glaserian grounded theory in naturalistic settings, classic GT field study, field-based GT, naturalistic classic grounded theory | Glaserian GT, CGT, original grounded theory, classic GT |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Field-based classic grounded theory applies Barney Glaser's original (Glaserian) grounded theory method within naturalistic, in-situ settings — combining sustained field immersion with the classic GT emphasis on emergence, theoretical sensitivity, and the constant comparative method. The researcher enters the social scene without a predetermined framework, collects data through observation and naturalistic interviews, and allows a substantive theory to surface inductively from the field rather than imposing conceptual structure in advance. | Classic Grounded Theory (CGT) is a systematic qualitative methodology for generating substantive theory from empirical data. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, it uses iterative cycles of data collection, constant comparison, and memo writing to produce a core category and surrounding conceptual framework that explains a social or psychological process. Unlike its later variants, Glaserian CGT insists on emergence — theory must arise from data without forcing preconceived frameworks. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|