方法对比

	Feminist Standpoint Analysis	Intersectionality Analysis
领域	Gender Studies	Gender Studies
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	1983	1989
提出者	Nancy Hartsock, Dorothy Smith, Sandra Harding	Kimberlé Crenshaw
类型	Critical feminist epistemology and analytic framework	Critical qualitative analytic framework
开创性文献	Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. ISBN: 9780801497469	Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
别名	Standpoint Theory, Feminist Standpoint Epistemology, Standpoint Methodology	Intersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative Analysis
相关	4	4
摘要	Feminist standpoint analysis is a critical epistemology and analytic strategy holding that all knowledge is socially situated, and that beginning inquiry from the everyday lives of marginalized people — historically women — yields a more complete and less distorted account of social reality than the supposedly neutral view from dominant positions. Developed by Nancy Hartsock, Dorothy Smith, and Sandra Harding in the 1980s, it argues that the marginalized see both the dominant order and its underside, and that this doubled vision, when methodically developed into an achieved standpoint, can ground a 'strong objectivity' superior to claims of value-free detachment.	Intersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.