ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Feminist Standpoint Analysis×批判性话语分析 (CDA)×
领域Gender Studies质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1983Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
提出者Nancy Hartsock, Dorothy Smith, Sandra HardingNorman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
类型Critical feminist epistemology and analytic frameworkQualitative research method
开创性文献Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. ISBN: 9780801497469Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗
别名Standpoint Theory, Feminist Standpoint Epistemology, Standpoint MethodologyCDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
相关46
摘要Feminist standpoint analysis is a critical epistemology and analytic strategy holding that all knowledge is socially situated, and that beginning inquiry from the everyday lives of marginalized people — historically women — yields a more complete and less distorted account of social reality than the supposedly neutral view from dominant positions. Developed by Nancy Hartsock, Dorothy Smith, and Sandra Harding in the 1980s, it argues that the marginalized see both the dominant order and its underside, and that this doubled vision, when methodically developed into an achieved standpoint, can ground a 'strong objectivity' superior to claims of value-free detachment.Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Feminist Standpoint Analysis · Critical Discourse Analysis. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare