ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

女权主义研究方法论×话语分析×
领域质性质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1970s–1980s (formalized as a methodology)1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
提出者Sandra Harding, Dorothy Smith, Patricia Hill Collins, and the broader feminist social science movementNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
类型Qualitative research methodMethod
开创性文献Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues. Indiana University Press. link ↗Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗
别名feminist inquiry, feminist qualitative research, feminist standpoint research, gender-critical researchDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
相关62
摘要Feminist research methodology is a qualitative approach grounded in feminist theory that centres gender, power, and social justice as core analytical lenses. It challenges claims of value-free objectivity, foregrounds the voices and experiences of marginalized groups — particularly women — and explicitly positions the researcher as a political and social actor. Developed across disciplines including sociology, education, and health sciences, it draws on standpoint theory, intersectionality, and participatory ethics to produce knowledge that can inform emancipatory practice.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Feminist Research Methodology · Discourse Analysis. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare