方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 女权主义研究方法论× | 话语分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1970s–1980s (formalized as a methodology) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| 提出者≠ | Sandra Harding, Dorothy Smith, Patricia Hill Collins, and the broader feminist social science movement | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues. Indiana University Press. link ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | feminist inquiry, feminist qualitative research, feminist standpoint research, gender-critical research | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 2 |
| 摘要≠ | Feminist research methodology is a qualitative approach grounded in feminist theory that centres gender, power, and social justice as core analytical lenses. It challenges claims of value-free objectivity, foregrounds the voices and experiences of marginalized groups — particularly women — and explicitly positions the researcher as a political and social actor. Developed across disciplines including sociology, education, and health sciences, it draws on standpoint theory, intersectionality, and participatory ethics to produce knowledge that can inform emancipatory practice. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|