ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Feminist Discourse Analysis×主题分析×
领域Gender Studies质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20052006
提出者Michelle M. LazarVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
类型Critical feminist discourse-analytic methodMethod
开创性文献Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164. DOI ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
别名Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis, FCDA, Feminist CDATA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
相关43
摘要Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis (FCDA) extends critical discourse analysis with an explicit feminist politics, examining how gender ideology and asymmetric power relations between women and men are produced, sustained, contested, and above all naturalized in texts and talk. Articulated by Michelle Lazar in her 2005 edited collection and 2007 programmatic article, it combines the close linguistic analysis of the CDA tradition with feminist theory to expose the often subtle, taken-for-granted sexism through which patriarchal arrangements come to seem ordinary and commonsensical.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Feminist Discourse Analysis · Thematic Analysis. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare