ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Feeling Thermometer Analysis×Candidate Evaluation Model×
领域政治心理学政治心理学
方法族Process / pipelineLatent structure
起源年份19641995
提出者American National Election Studies / Aage ClausenMilton Lodge, Marco Steenbergen & Donald Kinder
类型Affect rating instrumentLatent evaluation model
开创性文献Wilcox, C., Sigelman, L., & Cook, E. (1989). Some like it hot: Individual differences in responses to group feeling thermometers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(2), 246-257. DOI ↗Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 309-326. DOI ↗
别名Feeling Thermometer, Affect Thermometer, Thermometer Rating ScaleImpression-Driven Evaluation Model, Online Processing Model, Candidate Trait Evaluation Model
相关44
摘要The feeling thermometer is a survey instrument that asks respondents to rate their warmth or favorability toward a person, group, or institution on a 0-to-100 scale, where 0 is very cold/unfavorable, 100 is very warm/favorable, and 50 is neutral. Introduced in the American National Election Studies in the 1960s, it is the standard measure of political affect, and its analysis underpins candidate evaluation, group affect, and affective-polarization research.A candidate evaluation model represents how voters form overall assessments of political candidates as a latent function of perceived traits (competence, leadership, integrity, empathy), partisanship, issue proximity, and affect. It spans the trait-based factor models of Kinder et al. (1980) and the online-processing tally model of Lodge, Steenbergen and Brau (1995), which describes evaluation as a running summary updated as information arrives.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Feeling Thermometer Analysis · Candidate Evaluation Model. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare