方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 足踝功能评分× | 全球变化评分量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 运动医学 | 运动医学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2001 | 1989 |
| 提出者≠ | Ewa M. Roos, Mats Brandsson, H. Hugelhotz, M. Klassbo, L. Stefan Lohmander | Ruben Jaeschke, Jack Singer, Gordon H. Guyatt |
| 类型≠ | Patient self-report | Patient global perception |
| 开创性文献≠ | Roos EM, Brandsson M, Hugelhotz H, Klassbo M, Lohmander LS. Development and validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001;31(9):504-514. link ↗ | Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10(4):407-415. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | FAOS | GRC, Global Rating of Change |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) is a 42-item patient self-report instrument designed to assess symptoms, function, and activity limitations in individuals with foot and ankle pathology. Developed by Roos and colleagues in 2001 and published in the Journal of Orthopedic & Sports Physical Therapy, the FAOS has become the standard outcome measure in foot and ankle surgery and rehabilitation research, providing comprehensive evaluation across pain, stiffness, physical function, sport/recreation, and foot-ankle-related quality of life. | The Global Rating of Change (GRC) Scale is a single-item, self-report outcome measure that asks patients to rate the overall change in their condition since baseline assessment. Developed by Jaeschke, Singer, and Guyatt in 1989 and published in Controlled Clinical Trials, the GRC Scale has become a fundamental method for anchor-based interpretation of change scores on clinical outcome measures, enabling clinicians and researchers to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in standardized scales. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|