方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 面对面研究日记× | 研究日志× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 调查方法论 | 调查方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1981–1989 (systematic articulation in qualitative fieldwork literature) | 1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology |
| 提出者≠ | Robert G. Burgess (systematic research diary in fieldwork); Mary Louise Holly (professional journal writing) | Robert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment) |
| 类型 | Qualitative data collection and reflexivity tool | Qualitative data collection and reflexivity tool |
| 开创性文献≠ | Holly, M. L. (1989). Writing to Grow: Keeping a Personal-Professional Journal. Heinemann. ISBN: 978-0435084592 | Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83. link ↗ |
| 别名 | in-person research journal, fieldwork reflexive diary, face-to-face researcher journal, in-person reflexive log | researcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diary |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | A face-to-face research diary is a systematic reflexive log maintained by the researcher during in-person fieldwork. Unlike participant diaries, this is the researcher's own running record of observations, analytic thoughts, methodological decisions, and emotional responses captured during or immediately after direct, embodied encounters with participants or field settings. It serves simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument within qualitative research. | A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|