方法对比

	可解释命名实体识别	可解释情感分析
领域	深度学习	深度学习
方法族	Machine learning	Machine learning
起源年份	2018–2020	2016–2020
提出者	Community-driven (NLP + XAI research)	Multiple contributors (LIME: Ribeiro et al. 2016; SHAP: Lundberg & Lee 2017; attention-based XAI in NLP: numerous, 2018–2020)
类型	Interpretability-augmented sequence labeling	Interpretable NLP pipeline
开创性文献	Danilevsky, M., Qian, K., Aharonov, R., Katsis, Y., Kawas, B., & Sen, P. (2020). A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processing. Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (AACL-IJCNLP), pp. 447–459.	Danilevsky, M., Qian, K., Aharonov, R., Katsis, Y., Kawas, B., & Sen, P. (2020). A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processing. Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the ACL and the 10th IJCNLP, 447–459.
别名	XAI-NER, Interpretable NER, Transparent Named Entity Recognition, Explainable NER	XAI sentiment analysis, interpretable sentiment classification, transparent opinion mining, explainable opinion analysis
相关	6	5
摘要	Explainable Named Entity Recognition (XAI-NER) combines a standard NER model — typically a BERT-based or BiLSTM-CRF sequence labeler — with post-hoc or intrinsic explainability techniques such as LIME, SHAP, attention visualization, or gradient-based saliency to reveal why each token was assigned a particular entity label. This transparency is essential in high-stakes domains like clinical text, legal documents, and biomedical literature.	Explainable sentiment analysis pairs a sentiment classification model — typically a fine-tuned transformer such as BERT or RoBERTa — with a post-hoc or intrinsic explanation method (SHAP, LIME, attention visualization, or integrated gradients) that reveals which words, phrases, or features drove each prediction. The goal is both high predictive accuracy and transparent, auditable rationales for every label.