ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

评估导向的定量优先混合方法设计×实用主义混合方法设计×
领域研究设计研究设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2003–2011Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century
提出者Teddlie & Tashakkori; Creswell & Plano ClarkJohn W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty
类型Mixed methods research designMixed methods research design
开创性文献Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761930129Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379
别名QUAN-priority evaluation mixed methods, quantitative-dominant evaluation design, evaluation mixed methods with quantitative priority, QUAN-priority eval MMRpragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods
相关66
摘要An evaluation-oriented quantitative-priority mixed methods design applies mixed methods inquiry within an evaluation context, where the primary purpose is judging a program, policy, or intervention. Quantitative data carry the greater evidential weight — measuring outcomes, effectiveness, and reach — while qualitative data serve as a secondary, explanatory strand that contextualizes and deepens interpretation of the quantitative findings.Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Evaluation-oriented quantitative-priority mixed methods design · Pragmatic Mixed Methods Design. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare