方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 面向评估的实用混合方法× | 行动研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 研究设计 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1946 |
| 提出者≠ | Jennifer C. Greene; Abbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie | Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury |
| 类型≠ | Mixed methods research design | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787984090 | Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | pragmatic evaluation mixed methods, program evaluation mixed methods, applied pragmatic mixed methods, mixed methods program evaluation | Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry |
| 相关≠ | 2 | 1 |
| 摘要≠ | Evaluation-oriented pragmatic mixed methods is a research design that combines quantitative and qualitative data collection within a pragmatist philosophical stance, expressly to evaluate programs, policies, or interventions. Rather than adhering rigidly to a single paradigm, it selects methods for their fitness to answer evaluation questions about program effectiveness, outcomes, and stakeholder experiences. The design is widely applied in education, public health, social services, and development evaluation contexts. | Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|