方法对比

	评估导向的混合方法矩阵	转型混合方法设计
领域	研究设计	研究设计
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	2000s (Teddlie & Tashakkori 2009; Greene 2007)	2003–2009
提出者	Teddlie & Tashakkori (matrix framework); Greene (evaluation-oriented framing)	Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
类型	Mixed methods design variant	Mixed methods research design
开创性文献	Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761930129	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
别名	evaluation MMM, mixed methods display matrix for evaluation, evaluation-focused methods matrix, program evaluation mixed methods matrix	transformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods
相关	5	6
摘要	The evaluation-oriented mixed methods matrix is a structured planning and display tool applied within program evaluation contexts. It maps evaluation questions against data sources, timing, and method types — quantitative and qualitative — in a grid format, making the integration logic explicit and auditable. Rooted in Greene's value-engaged mixed methods tradition and Teddlie and Tashakkori's matrix framework, it serves evaluators who must justify methodological choices to stakeholders while addressing multiple evaluation purposes simultaneously.	Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities.