ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

以评估为重点的干预混合方法×随机对照试验 (RCT)×
领域研究设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineHypothesis test
起源年份2000s (systematized ~2007–2011)1948
提出者Creswell & Plano Clark (systematized); roots in evaluation research by Patton and ShadishJames Lind (early precursor, 1747); modern formulation: Austin Bradford Hill & Medical Research Council (1948)
类型Mixed methods research designInterventional comparative study
开创性文献Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483346298Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G., Moher, D., for the CONSORT Group (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials. BMJ, 340, c332. DOI ↗
别名intervention mixed methods evaluation, mixed methods intervention evaluation, program evaluation mixed methods, evaluation mixed methodsRCT, randomised controlled trial, clinical trial, Randomize Kontrollü Çalışma (RCT) Tasarımı
相关27
摘要Evaluation-focused intervention mixed methods is a research design that embeds both quantitative and qualitative strands within an intervention or program evaluation study. It combines outcome measurement — typically from a randomized or quasi-experimental trial — with qualitative investigation of how and why the intervention worked, for whom, and under what conditions. The design is widely used in health, education, social service, and policy evaluation contexts where understanding mechanisms and context is as important as measuring effectiveness.A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the gold standard experimental design in clinical and health research, in which participants are randomly allocated to a treatment group or a control group so that the effect of an intervention can be measured with the highest possible degree of internal validity. The modern parallel-group RCT was formalized by Austin Bradford Hill and the Medical Research Council in their landmark streptomycin trial of 1948, and its reporting is governed today by the CONSORT 2010 guidelines (Schulz et al., 2010).
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Evaluation-focused Intervention Mixed Methods · Randomized Controlled Trial. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare