ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Ethnocentrism Scale×社会距离量表×
领域政治心理学跨文化护理
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20011933
提出者James W. Neuliep & James C. McCroskeyEmory Bogardus
类型Self-report attitude scaleSelf-report
开创性文献Neuliep, J. W. (2002). Assessing the reliability and validity of the Generalized Ethnocentrism Scale. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 31(4), 201-215. link ↗Bogardus, E. S. (1933). A social distance scale. Sociology and Social Research, 17(3), 265–271. link ↗
别名GENE Scale, Ethnocentrism Scale, Generalized Ethnocentrism ScaleSDS, Bogardus Scale
相关44
摘要The Generalized Ethnocentrism (GENE) Scale, developed by Neuliep and McCroskey, is a self-report instrument measuring ethnocentrism: the tendency to view one's own group as the center of the social universe and to judge other groups by its standards, with corresponding ingroup preference and outgroup derogation. In political science, the ethnocentrism construct was given prominence by Kinder and Kam's (2009) Us Against Them, which uses survey-based ethnocentrism measures to explain American policy opinion.The Social Distance Scale (SDS), also known as the Bogardus Scale, is a classic sociological instrument designed to measure the degree of social acceptance, prejudice, or social distance that individuals feel toward members of different ethnic, racial, or social groups. Originally developed by Emory Bogardus in 1933 and updated by researchers including Parrillo and Donoghue, the SDS assesses willingness for increasing levels of contact and intimacy with outgroup members, from casual acquaintance to family relationships. The scale is widely used in sociology, psychology, and health research to evaluate attitudes toward diversity and to track changes in intergroup relations.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Ethnocentrism Scale · Social Distance Scale. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare