ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于相对价值距离的选举法×准则重要性通过准则间相关性 (CRITIC)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20151995
提出者Shyur, H. J., Yin, L., Shih, H. S., Cheng, C. B.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
类型Prospect-theory value function with reference-point separationStatistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
开创性文献Shyur, H. J., Yin, L., Shih, H. S., Cheng, C. B. (2015). A multiple criteria decision making method based on relative value distances. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
别名
相关48
摘要ERVD (Election based on Relative Value Distances) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Shyur, H. J., Yin, L., Shih, H. S., Cheng, C. B. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: ERVD · CRITIC. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare