ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于相对价值距离的选举法×层次分析法×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20151980
提出者Shyur, H. J., Yin, L., Shih, H. S., Cheng, C. B.Saaty, T. L.
类型Prospect-theory value function with reference-point separationPairwise comparison (eigenvalue)
开创性文献Shyur, H. J., Yin, L., Shih, H. S., Cheng, C. B. (2015). A multiple criteria decision making method based on relative value distances. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713
别名
相关48
摘要ERVD (Election based on Relative Value Distances) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Shyur, H. J., Yin, L., Shih, H. S., Cheng, C. B. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: ERVD · AHP. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare