方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 等量转化混合方法设计× | 定量优先混合方法设计× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究设计 | 研究设计 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2003–2011 | 2003–2009 |
| 提出者≠ | Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark | Creswell & Plano Clark; Teddlie & Tashakkori |
| 类型 | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| 开创性文献 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| 别名 | QUAN+QUAL transformative design, equal-priority transformative MMR, transformative equal-status mixed design, balanced transformative mixed methods | QUAN-dominant mixed methods, quantitative-dominant mixed methods, quan-priority design, quantitative-first mixed methods |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | The equal-weight transformative mixed methods design combines quantitative and qualitative strands at equal priority (QUAN + QUAL) within an overarching transformative theoretical framework — such as feminist, critical race, disability rights, or social justice theory. Both data types carry equivalent evidential weight, and the entire study is structured to challenge inequity, give voice to marginalized groups, and generate findings oriented toward advocacy and social change. | Quantitative-priority mixed methods design is a research approach in which quantitative data and analysis carry the primary explanatory weight, while qualitative data play a supplementary or corroborating role. The researcher collects and analyzes quantitative data first (or concurrently with greater emphasis), then uses qualitative findings to elaborate, explain, or contextualize the statistical results. Priority and sequence together define where integration occurs and how each strand informs the other. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|