ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

等权重实用主义混合方法设计×定量优先混合方法设计×
领域研究设计研究设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2000s–2010s2003–2009
提出者Creswell, Plano Clark, Johnson, Onwuegbuzie (mixed methods methodology scholars)Creswell & Plano Clark; Teddlie & Tashakkori
类型Mixed methods research designMixed methods research design
开创性文献Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
别名equal-status pragmatic MMR, QUAL=QUAN pragmatic design, balanced pragmatic mixed methods, equal-priority pragmatic designQUAN-dominant mixed methods, quantitative-dominant mixed methods, quan-priority design, quantitative-first mixed methods
相关66
摘要Equal-weight pragmatic mixed methods is a research design in which quantitative and qualitative strands are assigned the same methodological priority (QUAL = QUAN) and conducted from a pragmatist philosophical stance. Rather than privileging one paradigm, the researcher selects and combines methods that best answer the research question — treating practical utility as the primary criterion for all design decisions.Quantitative-priority mixed methods design is a research approach in which quantitative data and analysis carry the primary explanatory weight, while qualitative data play a supplementary or corroborating role. The researcher collects and analyzes quantitative data first (or concurrently with greater emphasis), then uses qualitative findings to elaborate, explain, or contextualize the statistical results. Priority and sequence together define where integration occurs and how each strand informs the other.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Equal-weight pragmatic mixed methods · Quantitative-priority mixed methods design. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare