ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS)×癌症治疗功能评估-通用版 (FACT-G)×
领域肿瘤护理肿瘤护理
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19911993
提出者Eduardo BrueraDavid Cella
类型Patient self-report multisymptom palliative care scalePatient self-report questionnaire
开创性文献Bruera, E., Kuehn, N., Miller, M. J., Selmser, P., & Macmillan, K. (1991). The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care, 7(2), 6–9. DOI ↗Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., et al. (1993). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of a general measure. J Clin Oncol, 11(3), 570–579. DOI ↗
别名ESAS, Edmonton Symptom Assessment ScaleFACT-General
相关44
摘要The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System is a rapid, validated 9-item tool that assesses the severity of common symptoms in cancer and palliative care patients: pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite loss, general well-being, and shortness of breath. Developed by Bruera and colleagues at the University of Alberta in 1991, the ESAS has become the standard symptom-screening instrument in oncology clinics, palliative care units, and end-of-life care settings worldwide, enabling efficient symptom prioritization and management escalation.The FACT-G is a 27-item self-report questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life in cancer patients across four key domains: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Developed by Cella et al. in 1993, it has become one of the most widely used generic QoL instruments in oncology research and clinical practice, translated into 40+ languages and validated across diverse cancer populations.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: ESAS · FACT-G. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare