方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 动态倾向得分匹配× | 倾向得分加权法 (PSW / IPW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 因果推断 | 因果推断 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 1986-2010 | 1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator) |
| 提出者≠ | Robins (1986) on sequential treatments; Lechner & Miquel (2010) on dynamic matching | Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting) |
| 类型≠ | Sequential causal matching | Causal inference / reweighting |
| 开创性文献≠ | Lechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | dynamic PSM, sequential propensity score matching, longitudinal propensity matching, DPSM | PSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Dynamic Propensity Score Matching (DPSM) extends classic propensity score matching to settings where treatment is assigned repeatedly over time and earlier treatment choices influence later ones. It estimates the causal effect of entire treatment sequences or regime changes by constructing matched comparisons at each decision point using the full history of covariates and prior treatments. | Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003). |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|