ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

动态倾向得分匹配×Marginal Structural Model (MSM)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1986-20102000
提出者Robins (1986) on sequential treatments; Lechner & Miquel (2010) on dynamic matchingJames M. Robins, Miguel A. Hernan, Babette Brumback
类型Sequential causal matchingCausal model / semiparametric weighting
开创性文献Lechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
别名dynamic PSM, sequential propensity score matching, longitudinal propensity matching, DPSMMSM, MSM-IPTW, marginal structural Cox model, weighted structural model
相关65
摘要Dynamic Propensity Score Matching (DPSM) extends classic propensity score matching to settings where treatment is assigned repeatedly over time and earlier treatment choices influence later ones. It estimates the causal effect of entire treatment sequences or regime changes by constructing matched comparisons at each decision point using the full history of covariates and prior treatments.A marginal structural model is a causal modeling framework designed to estimate the effect of a time-varying treatment in the presence of time-varying confounders that are themselves affected by prior treatment. By reweighting observations with inverse probability of treatment weights, MSMs create a pseudo-population in which confounding is eliminated, enabling unbiased estimation of causal treatment contrasts even when standard regression adjustments would fail.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Dynamic Propensity Score Matching · Marginal Structural Model. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare