ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

动态倾向得分匹配×逆概率治疗加权法 (IPW / IPTW)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1986-20102000
提出者Robins (1986) on sequential treatments; Lechner & Miquel (2010) on dynamic matchingRobins, Hernán & Brumback
类型Sequential causal matchingCausal inference weighting estimator
开创性文献Lechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
别名dynamic PSM, sequential propensity score matching, longitudinal propensity matching, DPSMIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
相关65
摘要Dynamic Propensity Score Matching (DPSM) extends classic propensity score matching to settings where treatment is assigned repeatedly over time and earlier treatment choices influence later ones. It estimates the causal effect of entire treatment sequences or regime changes by constructing matched comparisons at each decision point using the full history of covariates and prior treatments.Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Dynamic Propensity Score Matching · Inverse Probability Weighting. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare