方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Dynamic Panel Models in Politics× | 面板数据分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | Political Science | 计量经济学 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 1995 | 1966–1978 |
| 提出者≠ | Nathaniel Beck & Jonathan Katz; Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond | Balestra & Nerlove (1966); Mundlak (1978); Hausman (1978) |
| 类型≠ | Dynamic regression model for time-series cross-section data | Panel regression framework |
| 开创性文献≠ | Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647. DOI ↗ | Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (6th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-3030539528 |
| 别名 | Dynamic TSCS models, Lagged dependent variable panel models, Time-series cross-section dynamic models, Dynamic time-series cross-section analysis | longitudinal data analysis, pooled cross-sectional time-series analysis, panel regression, data panel analysis |
| 相关≠ | 4 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Dynamic panel models for political science analyze time-series cross-section (TSCS) data — repeated observations on countries, dyads, states, or other units over many years — where the outcome today depends on its own past. By including a lagged dependent variable alongside unit fixed effects, these models capture persistence and inertia common in comparative politics and international relations, but doing so introduces the Nickell bias. Estimators such as Arellano-Bond and system GMM, and design choices such as Beck-Katz panel-corrected standard errors, were developed to recover credible dynamic estimates from such data. | Panel data analysis models data that track multiple units — countries, firms, individuals — over time, enabling researchers to control for unobserved unit-level heterogeneity that would otherwise bias cross-sectional or time-series estimates. The two core specifications are fixed effects and random effects, selected via the Hausman test. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|