方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 动态面板事件研究× | 面板事件研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 因果推断 | 因果推断 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 2021 | 1990s–2020s (modern panel formulation) |
| 提出者≠ | Sun & Abraham (2021); Callaway & Sant'Anna (2021) | Formalized by Freyaldenhoven, Hansen, Perez-Orive & Shapiro (2021); widely applied in finance (Fama et al. 1969) and policy evaluation |
| 类型≠ | Quasi-experimental / causal inference | Quasi-experimental / causal panel design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Callaway, B., & Sant'Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200-230. DOI ↗ | Freyaldenhoven, S., Hansen, C., Perez-Orive, J., & Shapiro, J. M. (2021). Visualization, Identification, and Estimation in the Linear Panel Event-Study Design. NBER Working Paper 29170. National Bureau of Economic Research. link ↗ |
| 别名 | dynamic event study, panel event-study regression, leads-and-lags event study, event-time panel design | event-study regression, dynamic DiD, relative-time regression, distributed-lag panel model |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The dynamic panel event study is a quasi-experimental method that uses panel data to trace out how a treatment effect evolves over time — before and after a defining event — by estimating a flexible regression of leads and lags around the treatment date. It simultaneously tests for pre-existing parallel trends and maps the full dynamic profile of causal impact across multiple post-event periods. | A panel event study estimates the dynamic causal effect of a treatment or policy by regressing an outcome on a full set of relative-time indicators — one for each period before and after the event — while controlling for unit and time fixed effects. The resulting coefficient plot shows how the treated units diverged from untreated units at each point in calendar time relative to their treatment date, making both pre-treatment trend violations and post-treatment effect trajectories immediately visible. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|