ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

动态逆概率加权×倾向得分加权法 (PSW / IPW)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1986-20001983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
提出者James M. Robins and colleaguesRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
类型Causal weighting estimatorCausal inference / reweighting
开创性文献Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
别名Dynamic IPW, Time-varying IPW, Longitudinal IPW, Sequential IPWPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
相关46
摘要Dynamic Inverse Probability Weighting (Dynamic IPW) estimates the causal effect of a time-varying treatment sequence by reweighting observed data to mimic a hypothetical randomised trial. Developed by Robins and colleagues in the context of marginal structural models, it handles the challenge that in longitudinal settings, past treatment affects future covariates, which in turn affect future treatment — a feedback loop that standard regression cannot untangle.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Dynamic Inverse Probability Weighting · Propensity Score Weighting. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare