ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

双盲单被试实验设计×单被试实验设计×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1970s–1980s (systematic integration of blinding into SCED)1960s (Sidman 1960; formal applied codification by Kazdin and Baer in 1970s–1980s)
提出者Barlow, Hersen, and colleagues (single-subject tradition); double-blind masking adapted from clinical trial methodologyMurray Sidman (foundational tactics); B. F. Skinner (applied behavior analysis lineage)
类型Experimental single-subject design with double-blind maskingExperimental research design
开创性文献Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195341881Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195030440
别名double-blind SCED, double-blind single-case experimental design, masked single-subject design, double-blind N-of-1 designSSED, single-case experimental design, n-of-1 design, intrasubject replication design
相关56
摘要A double-blind single-subject experimental design applies systematic masking — concealing treatment assignment from both the participant and the outcome assessor — within a within-person repeated-measures framework. It is used when researchers need strong causal inference about an intervention's effect on a single individual while guarding against placebo responses and observer bias. Particularly prominent in pharmacological, behavioral, and clinical rehabilitation research.Single-subject experimental design (SSED) establishes experimental control by repeatedly measuring one individual (or a small number of individuals) across baseline and intervention phases, using the participant as their own control. Instead of comparing groups, it compares the participant's own behavior across conditions over time. Widely used in applied behavior analysis, special education, rehabilitation, and clinical psychology, SSED allows causal inference from small or unique samples where group designs are impractical.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Double-blind single-subject experimental design · Single-Subject Experimental Design. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare