ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

双盲对照组实验设计×随机对照试验 (RCT)×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineHypothesis test
起源年份1930s–1950s (formalized in clinical trial methodology)1948
提出者R. A. Fisher (experimental control foundations); blinding practices evolved in clinical research through the 20th centuryJames Lind (early precursor, 1747); modern formulation: Austin Bradford Hill & Medical Research Council (1948)
类型Experimental research designInterventional comparative study
开创性文献Fisher, R. A. (1935). The Design of Experiments. Oliver and Boyd. link ↗Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G., Moher, D., for the CONSORT Group (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials. BMJ, 340, c332. DOI ↗
别名double-blind controlled experiment, DB-CG design, double-masked controlled trial, double-blind controlled studyRCT, randomised controlled trial, clinical trial, Randomize Kontrollü Çalışma (RCT) Tasarımı
相关57
摘要A double-blind control group experimental design is a rigorous experimental structure in which participants are randomly assigned to at least one treatment group and one control group, while both the participants and the researchers collecting or assessing outcomes are kept unaware of group assignment. By combining allocation concealment with blinding at two levels, the design minimizes expectancy bias, placebo effects, and assessor bias simultaneously, making it a cornerstone of high-quality intervention research in medicine, psychology, and the social sciences.A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the gold standard experimental design in clinical and health research, in which participants are randomly allocated to a treatment group or a control group so that the effect of an intervention can be measured with the highest possible degree of internal validity. The modern parallel-group RCT was formalized by Austin Bradford Hill and the Medical Research Council in their landmark streptomycin trial of 1948, and its reporting is governed today by the CONSORT 2010 guidelines (Schulz et al., 2010).
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Double-blind Control Group Experimental Design · Randomized Controlled Trial. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare