方法对比

	基于文档的项目评估	历史档案研究
领域	田野方法	田野方法
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	1960s–1970s (program evaluation field); document review as formal strategy codified in 1980s–1990s	19th century (formalized ~1820s–1880s)
提出者	Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi and Howard Freeman (systematic program evaluation tradition)	Historians and archivists; systematised through the professionalization of historical scholarship in the 19th century
类型	Evaluation research design	Qualitative primary-source research
开创性文献	Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787908331	Hill, M. R. (1993). Archival Strategies and Techniques. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0803951853
别名	documentary program evaluation, records-based evaluation, document review evaluation, archival program evaluation	archival research, historical document analysis, archival history, primary source research
相关	6	6
摘要	Document-based program evaluation is a systematic approach to assessing a program's design, implementation, and outcomes using existing documentary evidence — such as policy statements, implementation reports, budgets, meeting minutes, and program artifacts — rather than primary data collection through interviews or observation. It is particularly suited to retrospective evaluations, accountability reviews, and contexts where direct fieldwork is impractical or infeasible.	Historical archival research is a systematic method of investigating the past through the critical examination of primary source documents preserved in archives, libraries, and institutional collections. Researchers locate, access, authenticate, and interpret original records — such as government documents, correspondence, diaries, maps, and institutional files — to reconstruct events, trace processes, and build evidence-based historical arguments. It is foundational to historiography and widely applied across humanities and social science disciplines.