ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

教义法学研究×比较法分析×
领域田野方法田野方法
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19th century (systematised ~1860s–1880s in common law jurisdictions)Late 19th century; formalised 1900
提出者Common law tradition; systematised by jurists such as A.V. Dicey and John AustinGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (early conceptualisation); Raymond Saleilles and Édouard Lambert (modern discipline, 1900 Paris Congress)
类型Legal-analytical research methodQualitative legal research method
开创性文献Hutchinson, T. (2013). Researching and Writing in Law (3rd ed.). Thomson Reuters. ISBN: 9780455229829Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). An Introduction to Comparative Law (3rd ed., T. Weir, Trans.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198268598
别名black-letter law research, legal doctrine analysis, analytical jurisprudence, traditional legal scholarshipcomparative law, legal comparison, comparative jurisprudence, CLA
相关66
摘要Doctrinal legal research is the foundational methodology of legal scholarship. It systematically identifies, reads, and analyses authoritative legal sources — statutes, case law, constitutional texts, and regulations — to describe, explain, and critique the content and internal logic of legal doctrine. By working within the accepted hierarchy of legal sources, it answers the question 'What is the law?' with analytical rigour and interpretive precision, producing descriptions of settled doctrine and arguments for how ambiguities should be resolved.Comparative legal analysis is a structured research method that examines how two or more legal systems — whether national, regional, or supranational — address a common legal problem. By placing rules, doctrines, and judicial decisions side by side, researchers identify convergences, divergences, and the underlying societal, historical, and political forces that shape legal solutions. The method is foundational to law reform, harmonisation efforts, treaty drafting, and academic legal scholarship.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Doctrinal Legal Research · Comparative Legal Analysis. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare