ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于双重规范化的多重聚合方法×模糊层次分析法 (Fuzzy AHP)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20201983
提出者Liao, H., Wu, X.Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W.
类型Dual-normalisation aggregation (linear + vector)Pairwise comparison with Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN: l, m, u) judgments — umbrella over Van Laarhoven-Pedrycz 1983, Buckley 1985, Chang 1992 extent analysis, Cheng 1996 entropy-based
开创性文献Liao, H., Wu, X. (2020). DNMA: A double normalization-based multiple aggregation method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making. Omega DOI ↗Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要DNMA (Double Normalization-Based Multiple Aggregation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Liao, H., Wu, X. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.FUZZY-AHP (Fuzzy AHP — Fuzzy extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. in 1983. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: DNMA · FUZZY-AHP. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare