ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于双重规范化的多重聚合方法×Analytic Network Process (ANP,具有反馈和相互依赖性的AHP)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20201996
提出者Liao, H., Wu, X.Saaty, T. L.
类型Dual-normalisation aggregation (linear + vector)Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)
开创性文献Liao, H., Wu, X. (2020). DNMA: A double normalization-based multiple aggregation method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making. Omega DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8
别名
相关88
摘要DNMA (Double Normalization-Based Multiple Aggregation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Liao, H., Wu, X. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: DNMA · ANP. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare