ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

判别效度×验证性因子分析(CFA)×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份19591969
提出者Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. FiskeKarl Gustav Jöreskog
类型Validity evidence / psychometric evaluationHypothesis-testing latent variable model
开创性文献Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
别名discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validityCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
相关54
摘要Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Discriminant Validity · Confirmatory factor analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare