方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Discourse Completion Task× | 内容分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 语言学 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1989 | Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018 |
| 提出者≠ | Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper (CCSARP project) | Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research |
| 类型≠ | Written/oral elicitation instrument for speech-act data | Qualitative / mixed-method research technique |
| 开创性文献≠ | Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.) (1989). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Ablex Publishing. ISBN: 9780893915131 | Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661 |
| 别名 | Discourse Completion Test, DCT, Production Questionnaire | İçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis |
| 相关≠ | 3 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | The discourse completion task (DCT) is an elicitation instrument widely used in pragmatics to gather data on how people perform speech acts such as requests, apologies, refusals, and compliments. Respondents read short descriptions of situations and write (or say) what they would utter in each, allowing researchers to collect comparable speech-act data across many speakers, languages, and cultures under controlled conditions. It was popularized by the Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realization Project (CCSARP) of Blum-Kulka, House, and Kasper in 1989. | Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|