方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 有向模块度分析× | 中间性中心度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 网络分析 | 网络分析 |
| 方法族 | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| 起源年份≠ | 2008 | 1977 |
| 提出者≠ | Leicht, E. A. & Newman, M. E. J. | Freeman, L. C. |
| 类型≠ | Community detection / graph partitioning | Centrality measure |
| 开创性文献≠ | Leicht, E. A., & Newman, M. E. J. (2008). Community structure in directed networks. Physical Review Letters, 100(11), 118703. DOI ↗ | Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | directed community detection via modularity, directed Q-modularity, digraph modularity optimization, Leicht-Newman modularity | Freeman betweenness, BC, geodesic betweenness, shortest-path betweenness |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Directed modularity analysis extends the classic Newman-Girvan modularity framework to directed graphs, where edges carry a source and a destination. Formalized by Leicht and Newman in 2008, it partitions nodes into communities by maximizing a modularity score that accounts for each node's separate in-degree and out-degree in the null model, making it the standard approach for community detection in citation networks, information flows, and other asymmetric relational data. | Betweenness centrality, formalized by Linton C. Freeman in 1977, measures how often a node lies on the shortest path connecting every other pair of nodes in a network. High-betweenness nodes act as bridges or brokers: removing them fragments the network into disconnected components more severely than removing any other nodes. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|