ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

数字施特劳斯扎根理论×主题分析×
领域质性质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990 (Strauss & Corbin foundational); digital adaptation 2000s–2010s2006
提出者Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin (foundational GT); adapted to digital contexts by subsequent methodologistsVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
类型Qualitative research design and analysis approachMethod
开创性文献Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803959408Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
别名digital GT (Straussian), Straussian GT in digital contexts, online Straussian grounded theory, digital Strauss-Corbin grounded theoryTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
相关63
摘要Digital Straussian grounded theory applies the systematic, coding-driven approach of Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory to digital data sources such as online forums, social media, chat logs, and digital documents. It retains the Straussian paradigm model and three-stage coding structure — open, axial, and selective — while adapting sampling strategies, theoretical saturation criteria, and ethical protocols to the unique features of online and digital research environments.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Digital Straussian Grounded Theory · Thematic Analysis. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare