方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 数字对话分析× | 话语分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1974 (CA foundations); 1990s–2000s (digital adaptation) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| 提出者≠ | Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA foundations); Susan Herring (computer-mediated discourse adaptation) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative discourse analysis method | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | DCA, online conversation analysis, digital CA, computer-mediated conversation analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 2 |
| 摘要≠ | Digital Conversation Analysis (DCA) applies the systematic, turn-by-turn analytical procedures of Conversation Analysis (CA) to digital and computer-mediated interactions — including chat logs, social media threads, instant messages, and online forums. Rooted in the foundational CA framework of Sacks, Schegloff, and Jefferson, DCA adapts classical concepts such as turn-taking, adjacency pairs, and sequential organisation to account for the asynchronous, multimodal, and textual character of online communication. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|